|
Ed
310 Group Technology Presentation Rubric
|
|||||
| Excellent |
Proficiency
|
Developing
Proficiency
|
Unsatisfactory
|
||
| Category |
6
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|
| Discussion of curiculum and Michigan Benchmarks | Solid presentation of content issues | Most content issues dealt with accurately | Some content issues dealt with accurately | Few content issues explained | |
| Pts | |||||
| Described range of software websites--students and teachers | Well researched range of software/websites | Description of the software/websites was sufficient | limited description of software/websites in the content area | Few references made to software/websites | |
| Pts | |||||
| Discussed other uses of technology |
Thorough
and creative applications
|
Some
ideas about other applications
|
Limited
ideas about other applications
|
Few
references to other uses
|
|
| Pts | |||||
| Described learning theory connectiions | Strong connections made to learning theories | Some connections made to learning theories | Limited reference made to learning theories | Few references made to learning theories | |
| Pts | |||||
| PowerPoint presentation | Very Creative us of PP program | Solid, effective use of PP program | Limited-but still helpful-use of PP program | Nominal, ineffective use of PP program | |
| Pts | |||||
| Use of professional vocabulaary |
Eloquent
use of professional vocabulary
|
Professional
vocabulary always on-target
|
Most
professional terms used accurately
|
Limited
use of professional vocabulary
|
|
| Pts | |||||
| Poise, confidence, use of eye contact | Clearly confident and comfortable throughout | Usually confident, though somewhat nervous at times | Limited, eye contact-mosstly looked away from audience-nervous | Limited direct eyecontact-usually nervous | |
| Pts | |||||
| Shared responsibility | Strong design to make best/creative use of everyone fairly | Attention to fairly divide material presented was evident | Division of material was uneven among grooup members | One member dominataed most of the presentation | |
| Pts | |||||
| Overall vocal presentation skills | Engaging and articulate presentation | Spoke engagingly most of the time | Some voice modulation | Monotones with limited modulation | |
| Pts | |||||
| Preparation | Strong evidence of preparation and enthusiasm | Preparation and interest was evident | Preparation was evident | Preparation seemed to be limited | |
| Pts | |||||
| Sequencing of presentation and transitions | Strong sequencing of events-transitions generally smooth | Attention to sequencing was evident-transitions were generally smooth | Sequencing of events was uneven-most transitions were smooth | Limited organization in sequencing-some transitions were smooth | |
| Pts | |||||
| Total Points | |||||