Expository Writing I: Technology and Society
Instructor: Curtis Gruenler English
113.15, Fall 2003
Office: Lubbers 306 Office
phone: 395-7996
E-mail: gruenler@hope.edu Home
phone 399-3731
Office hours: MWRF 3:30-4:30, R 11-12, and by
appointment (Please
don’t call after 9 p.m.)
“It was no thought or word that called culture into being, but a tool or a weapon. After the stone axe we needed song and story to remember innocence, to record effect—and so to describe the limits, to say what can be done without damage.” –Wendell Berry
Goals
The
primary goal of English 113 is to improve your writing skills. Through
attention to each aspect of the writing process, you will become better able to
write clear and coherent expository prose that is purposefully organized,
written with attention to style, and developed in a manner appropriate to the
audience and situation. Effective expository writing also depends on your
ability to read and think critically and to do research, so we will work on
these skills too. We will be practicing these skills through investigating
together the relationships between technology and society, and I hope that you
will also develop greater insight into the issues we discuss and become better
able to make good judgments about our technological society and your own use of
technology.
Here
is how the English department has expressed the goals of English 113.
· Goal 1: To help students
improve their skills in expository writing.
1.
Students will approach writing as a process--exploring, planning, and
organizing; giving attention to purpose and audience; drafting; revising and
editing.
2.
Students will develop their ideas using effective means of organization and support.
3.
Students will construct unified and coherent paragraphs and will employ varied
sentence structures and effective word choice to develop a vigorous prose
style.
4.
Students will engage in workshop evaluations of one another’s drafts as a means
of sharpening their thinking about writing.
5.
Students will submit final essays with correct spelling, grammar, and
punctuation.
· Goal 2: To help students
improve their library and research skills.
1.
Students will analyze and focus research assignments or topics.
2.
Students will evaluate and use primary and secondary sources, including
electronic and field research, where appropriate, in addition to the library.
3.
Students will document sources accurately, using the MLA style.
· Goal 3: To engage students
in a significant intellectual question or topic.
1.
Students will read, analyze, evaluate, and discuss texts, for both content and
technique.
2.
Students will engage in critical thinking about issues and arguments.
Requirements
Written work: I will ask you to do two
main kinds of writing: formal essays and various informal responses and
assignments. The best way to learn to write is by writing, and you will do a
total of at least 50 pages of writing, 20 of which will be in polished, final
form. Informal writing gives you an opportunity to practice writing as a way of
thinking, and formal essays give you practice in producing the kind of finished
product that will be expected of you in academic and other contexts. Informal
assignments will generally not be graded with a letter grade, but you will get
credit for them at the end as part of your participation in the class. The
informal assignments are designed to help prepare you to do a good job on the
formal essays.
For the formal essays, you will first turn in a
rough draft in order to get feedback on it through small group workshops. On
workshop days, you will need to bring extra copies of your rough draft to
class. The number of extra copies will depend on what kind of workshop we are
having that day.
At the end of the semester, you will submit all
drafts of your formal essays in a portfolio along with a concluding essay
reflecting on your development as a writer during the semester. Portfolios may
also include rewritten versions of final drafts of papers you submitted earlier
in the semester. Further instructions on assembling your portfolio will come
later.
After I grade each essay, you may rewrite it once
for a new grade that will replace the previous one. Since you only get one more
chance, be thorough. You may turn these rewrites in at any time up until you
submit your final portfolio.
You will have a great deal of freedom to choose
topics for your formal essays that interest you. Your best writing will come
from writing about something you care about. The requirements for each essay
will have more to do with what kind of writing I ask you to do and what kind of
sources to use. Here’s a brief overview of the four formal essay assignments:
Participation and
attendance:
Class discussion is crucial to reaching the goals of this course, so success
will depend on your attendance and active participation in class sessions. I
will excuse two absences automatically. Beyond two, I will excuse absences only
by prior arrangement or for serious illness or emergency. (If you feel like
you’ve got the flu, please stay in bed or go to the Health Clinic instead of
going to class.) Each unexcused absence will lower your participation grade a
step. Assigned work must be completed even if you are absent, though I am happy
to grant extensions for sickness and emergencies—just ask.
Grading
Participation
(including small group) and informal writing: 25%
Essay
1: 15%
Essay
2: 15%
Essay
3: 20%
Essay
4: 15%
Completed
portfolio and conclusion: 10%
Due dates: Having rough drafts for
workshop days is crucial to the mechanics of the course. Therefore, not having
a complete rough draft on a workshop day will incur a one-letter-grade penalty
on the final draft. Grades for late final drafts will be lowered a step for
each week they are late. You must complete all the formal essays in order to
receive a grade for the course.
All
work turned in for this course should represent the work of the person whose
name appears on it. Representing another’s work as your own is not only
dishonest, it also defeats your learning. Please do learn from others by
discussing texts and assignments with them both inside and outside of class. I
am happy to discuss assignments with you while you are working on them. And you
are welcome to learn from any other sources. In the end, however, all written
work must be done by you alone.
Unacknowledged use of another’s words or ideas is
plagiarism. Any quotation or direct copying from another’s work must be set off
from your text either by quotation marks or by indentation, and it must be
given an adequate citation (this includes quotations from our required texts as
well as any other sources you use). Paraphrases must also be given an adequate
citation. If you are uncertain about how to avoid plagiarism or how to give
adequate citations, consult A Writer’s
Reference, and if you have any questions, talk with me. Cases of academic
dishonesty will be handled using the procedures outlined in the Hope College Catalog. The penalty is
failure, either of the assignment or of the entire course, depending on the
instructor’s judgment of the seriousness of the case.
Answers
from spring, 2003 students (all the ones that filled out a form) to the
question at the end of the semester: What advice would you give a friend who is
planning to take this course?
Additional Help
The
Academic Support Center (ext. 7830) on the second floor of Van Zoeren offers
individual help with your writing. Call for an appointment. There is no charge.
Berry, Wendell. In the Presence of Fear. Great
Barrington, MA: The Orion Society, 2001.
Hacker, Diana. A Writer’s Reference. Fifth edition.
Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003.
Paul, Richard,
and Linda Elder, The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools Pocket-Size
Guide, Foundation for Critical Thinking, 1999.
Teich, Albert H., ed. Technology and the Future. Ninth
edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson, 2002. $36
A college dictionary (I
recommend the American Heritage College
Dictionary, Fourth Edition).
Schedule
Note: TF
refers to Technology and the Future.
Aug. 26: Introduction
Aug. 28: Read Stephen Talbott, “Why Is the Moon Getting Farther Away?” (handout, also online at http://www.praxagora.com/stevet/netfuture/1998/Apr3098_70.html - 1) and write a paragraph describing an educational experience it brings to mind.
Sept. 2: Read “Computers in
Education: The Web and the Plow” by Lowell Monke (handout, also online at http://www.gemair.com/~lmonke/). Read Hacker section C1 (pp.
3-12) and do writing exercise E-ex C1-1 at http://dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/wr_menu.asp.
Settle on a tentative focus for essay 1 and write out some ideas to share in
your small group. Also, take diagnostic Test A at http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/hackerdiag/.
Sept. 4: Read TF 1-12: Leo Marx,
“Does Improved Technology Mean Progress?” Read Hacker C2 (13-17). Write a
paragraph in answer to this question: What are Leo Marx’s audience, purpose,
and thesis in this essay? Also, bring to class two tentative thesis statements
for your essay 1. [Note: for further information about any of the authors in
TF, see the accompanying web site.]
Sept. 9: Read TF 23-36:
Alvin M. Weinberg, “Can Technology Replace Social Engineering?” and Wendell
Berry, “Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer.” Bring two good questions about
each article. Read Hacker C5 (37-42) and do E-ex C2-1 on thesis statements at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/wr_menu.asp.
Bring a revised version of your thesis statement for essay 1.
Sept. 11: TF 172-183: Brian
Martin, “Technological Vulnerability”; Berry 1-9, “Thoughts in the Presence of
Fear.” Write a paragraph on how the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack or the
August 14, 2003 blackout has affected your view of technology. Also do E-ex
C2-2 on introductions at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/wr_menu.asp
and bring a draft of your introduction for essay 1.
Sept. 16: Workshops on Essay 1
Sept.
18: Workshops on Essay 1
Sept. 23: Berry 11-31, “The
Idea of a Local Economy.” Write a one-page summary of Berry’s essay. Read
Hacker C3 (17-23) and do E-ex C3-2 at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/wr_menu.asp.
Sept. 25: TF 71-77: E. F.
Schumacher, “Buddhist Economics.” Read Hacker C4 (23-36) and bring a paragraph
from your current draft of essay 1 to work on during class.
Sept. 30: Read David
Ehrenfeld, “The Cow Tipping Point” (handout) and pages 1-14 of The Miniature
Guide to Critical Thinking. Bring an ad to analyze during class. Final
draft of Essay 1 due.
Sept.
30-Oct. 1 (Tues. evening-Wed. afternoon): Critical Issues Symposium
Oct. 2: TF 196-208 on stem
cell research. Write an analysis of a presentation from the Critical Issues
Symposium using the template on page 10 of the Guide to Critical Thinking.
Oct. 7: Read TF 209-227,
Leon Kass, “The Wisdom of Repugnance” and Jerome Groopman, “Science Fiction: A
Comment on Leon Kass’s Bioethics.” Read Hacker C6 (46-54). Write a paragraph
about whether you find Kass or Groopman more convincing and why. Bring a draft
of your introduction for essay 2.
Oct. 9: Read Bruce Sterling,
chapter 1 of Tomorrow Now (handout). Draft of Essay 2 due. Do
E-ex C3-1 on peer review at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/wr_menu.asp.
Oct. 14: Fall Recess
Oct. 16: Read TF 148-164,
Langdon Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Pick a piece of technology and
write a page analyzing its politics.
Oct. 21: Read TF 231-241,
Paul Ceruzzi, “An Unforeseen Revolution” and 258-267, Lawrence Lessig, “The
Internet Under Siege”; Lev Grossman, “It’s All Free” (handout). Final draft of essay 2 due.
Oct. 23: Read “FAQ on
Computerized Technology and Human Responsibility” by Stephen Talbott, http://www.praxagora.com/stevet/netfuture/faq.html.
Read Hacker R1 (395-309) and do E-ex R1-1 on research questions at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/rs_menu.asp.
Bring three good research questions on your tentative topic for essay 3.
Oct. 28: Meet at Library
Teaching Lab. Read Hacker R2 and R3 (310-320).
Oct.
30: Meet at Library Teaching Lab. Read Hacker, MLA-1, MLA-2, and MLA-3
(329-340) and do E-ex MLA 2-1 on plagiarism and MLA 3-1 on integrating sources
at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/rs_menu.asp.
Nov. 4: Report on research sources due.
Nov. 6: Read TF 295-322,
Bill Joy, “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us” and John Seely Brown and Paul
Duguid, “A Response to Bill Joy and the Doom-and-Gloom Technofuturists.” Read
Hacker MLA-4 and MLA-5 (340-377) and do E-ex MLA4-1 at http://www.dianahacker.com/writersref/flash/rs_menu.asp.
Nov. 11: Draft of Essay 3 due.
Nov. 13: Read Gardner
Dozois, “A Knight of Ghosts and Shadows” (handout). Write a paragraph about how
you would like to see the story continue.
Nov. 18: Read Linda Nagata,
“Goddesses” (handout). Final draft of Essay 3 due. Bring topic for essay
4.
Nov.
20: Workshops on Essay 4.
Nov. 25: Workshops on Essay 4.
Nov.
27: Thanksgiving
Dec. 2: Read Berry 33-42,
“In Distrust of Movements.”
Dec.
4: Wrap up. Final draft of essay 4 due.
Dec. 11: Final portfolio due by noon. Please hand it
in at the English department office, and be sure it has my name on it. If you
would like me to return it to you by mail, please include a self-addressed envelope
that is big enough (the English dept. will pay for the postage).