English
375, History of the English Language
Research Essay
Goals: This project is a chance
for you to explore in more detail some theme, issue, or aspect of language that
grows out of the course. It is also a chance for you to learn some strategies
for doing historical language research.
Topic: The list of suggested topics
below is a guide; you may choose one of those projects, or invent one of your
own. I’ll be happy to give you guidance as you decide. Any topic, of course,
should require substantial research.
Expectations: As you can see from the
topic suggestions, the kind of thinking I’m looking for in this paper is to
apply to a particular case what you’ve learned about the history of English and
resources for studying it. This will mean something different depending on the
particular topic you choose. I’ll be looking for whether you’ve done
appropriate research (and, of course, cited and documented your sources
appropriately), how illuminating your thesis is, how effective your argument
is, and all the things that go into a well-written essay. You should come to an
informed conclusion about some dimension of language use, change, history, or
variety.
The Proposal: If you choose to do the
research paper instead of the final exam, I ask that on Oct. 24 you turn in a
proposal of what you plan to do. This should include:
·
A statement of the topic. What question(s) are you interested in
pursuing?
·
Any ideas you have so far about what research will be necessary and how
to do this research.
I
will give you some feedback on the topic and any suggestions I might have about
research. This proposal is not binding—you could change your topic later, but
you should write another proposal.
Documentation: All papers
must be thoroughly documented. I prefer the MLA style with parenthetical citations
in the text that refer to a list of works cited at the end. For directions on
how to cite electronic sources, consult The
New St. Martin’s Handbook or www.mla.org.
The Oxford English Dictionary will be a major source for many projects,
and to refer to the OED you may use
parenthetic references with the abbreviation “OED” and, if appropriate, a reference to a
numbered sense in the entry, such as (OED,
sense 8). If the headword of the entry you’re referring to is not clear from
your text, include that too, e.g. (OED,
“word,” sense 8). Avoid copying unfamiliar abbreviations from the dictionary
into your essay. If you are using the printed OED, consult the lists of abbreviations at the front (for
abbreviations used in etymologies and definitions) and the back (for titles of
sources of quotations). If you are using the online dictionary, consult the
necessary help screens.
Length: Appropriate length will
depend somewhat on the nature of the project, but think of a ballpark figure of
at least 2000 words.
Due: A complete draft is due on
Tuesday, Nov. 21. I will return these after Thanksgiving with comments meant to
help you revise your final draft, which is due Thursday, Dec. 7.
I’d
be glad talk with you about your essay at any stage, from conception to
revision.
1.
Philological explication: Choose a brief poem, or a brief passage of a longer work in verse or
prose, from any period of literature in English, and explicate its sense using
the tools of philology you have learned in this course. For example, use the OED
to explore all the possible meanings of important words and their
etymologies. Pay attention also to form and style. A distinction is often drawn
between philology and literary criticism, but this kind of literary analysis is
where the two most often meet. Any work of literature is fair game, including
those by the Inklings and those written for children or adolescents. For a good
example of philological analysis of The Lord of the Rings, see Tom Shippey’s books The Road to Middle Earth and J.
R. R. Tolkien: Author of the Century. Pages 68-77 of the latter, for
instance, contain a brilliant stylistic analysis of the “Council of Elrond”
chapter. If you need further guidance on what is involved in literary
explication, I have a handout I’d be happy to give you.
2. Literary representation
of varieties of English. Analyze the representation of a variety (or varieties) of English
within a literary work. Depending on the particular example, you might consider
questions such as: Is the variety represented accurately according to what we
know from other sources? What methods does the author use to represent it
effectively? What does this variety of English signify in the text? What
attitudes about the language and its varieties are apparent? If different
characters speak in different dialects, for example, what are the social
consequences for them? In general, I will be looking for you to make some
connections between the example you choose and issues that we are discussing in
the course, but the particular direction you go with your essay will depend a
lot on the work or works you choose to study. Some examples of works that might
lend themselves well to this kind of study: regional and social varieties of
English in works by Mark Twain or Toni Morrison, or historical varieties in a
work like Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee in
King Arthur’s Court; regional or cultural varieties in contemporary
children’s literature. You could also do something similar with an oral medium
such as a film or record album.
3. Lexical snapshot. Examine the new words that
were coming into English at a particular time in history. You could look at
them from a number of perspectives: How do they reflect the wider history of
the time? What patterns are visible in their sources, and why? What patterns
are apparent in their grammatical nature (part of speech, inflectional forms)?
What segment of society seems to have been responsible for pushing the growth
of the lexicon?
American
Speech, the journal of the American Dialect Society, contains a new word
section in each issue, going back to 1925. Many dictionaries have such lists
too. The OED, of course, gives earliest known usages in print for each word.
The book English Through
the Ages lists words according to when the OED shows them entering the
language (I have a copy you may borrow).
4. Fictional new English. Examine a novel in which a
new variety of English is invented, such as Suzette Haden Elgin’s Native Tongue, Russell Hoban’s Riddley Walker, or Anthony Burgess’s Clockwork Orange. How does the new
language come about? How does it differ from current standard
English? How does it compare to patterns of real historical change in English?
What cultural functions is it represented as serving?
You could also look at a work that invents many new
terms, such as Tolkien’s fiction or Orwell’s 1984. How do the new terms relate to the existing language? How are
they important to the literary aims and effects of the work as a whole?
5. Usage issues. Examine the history of a
rule devised in response to a perceived usage problem, as David Crystal does
with the prohibition of split infinitives on CEEL p. 195. Use an assortment of handbooks, grammar books, and
perhaps dictionaries to get a variety of viewpoints. For a good current
perspective consult Barbara Wallraff’s Word Court (I have a copy). Choose one
or two issues and examine the historical roots of the rules, guidelines, or
prescriptions. How do they reflect the wider history of attitudes toward English?
6. Group English. Examine the English used
by a particular group or region. How does it change over time? How does it bind
the group together and set it apart from others? How do individual users shift
between that variety of English and other, more standard varieties? How does
this variety compare to patterns of social variation that linguists have found
elsewhere?
7. English style. Examine the style of a
particular kind of writing, such as newspaper writing (e.g. The Anchor) or writing for children,
using the same source over a period of time. Analyze shifts of vocabulary,
grammar, tone, punctuation, etc. How might these reflect larger trends in the
history of English?
8. Dictionaries. Analyze closely the
approaches to English taken by two or three recent dictionaries. How do they
approach change, variety, and usage? What attitudes toward language does each
embody? What are the historical roots of those attitudes? What audience is each
aimed at? What kinds of users would be likely to find each one appealing, or
dangerous? What aims set them apart from each other? How well does each
succeed?
9. Teaching English. Choose an issue in the
teaching of English and examine it from a historical perspective. What is the
history of the issue? How can the history of English be brought to bear on
thinking about this particular issue? Or, what are some instructional
applications (as the Michigan Dept. of Education puts it) of the history of
English? Or, look at some aspect of the teaching of English and how it has
changed over the years. The Joint Archives in the bottom floor of Van Wylen could be a good resource for looking at the history
the teaching of English at Hope.
11. Owen Barfield’s theories of poetic diction and
the evolution of consciousness. Topic 1: How does Barfield apply his ideas about
meaning in language to poetry in Poetic Diction? How would you apply
them to poetry that you know and love? Topic 2: Barfield articulates a large
theory of the evolution of consciousness in Saving the Appearances and
the essays collected in The Rediscovery of Meaning. How might this
theory help us understand a work of literature, drama, or film? Further
suggestion: I think Barfield is especially valuable for understanding aspects
of what has come to be called postmodernism.
12.
Set of lesson plans. Prepare a detailed series of lesson plans for a course (e.g. a high
school English course) based on the philological study of language and
literature. For this I would expect something longer than 2000 words in order
to reflect an equal amount of effort to what would go into a regular essay.
Also, you would still need to do research beyond our course texts; your
bibliography might become a list of resources for yourself, a fellow teacher,
or your students.